V.Yemelin. Not expanding the track
In my opinion, the recent Dortmund tournament cannot boast about any global theoretical revelations. Crammers of the whole world can relax. Nevertheless, almost any game of the elite brings up a small opening finesse, and it is quite interesting to observe top grandmasters creating problems to each other outside the main theoretical roads. This article should be considered as a modest addition to my previously published article about the Dortmund.
Y.Razuvaev. Rubinstein Gambit
This is a chapter from the new book. I should bring my apologies to the reader in advance. The book was completed last year, thus some important games played this year are not included. However, chasing chess fashion is not very useful, although highly interesting occupation. An opening is like a city. One can explore it for a whole life and still be a stranger to it. I would like to quote a wise man David Bronstein, who commented the 7th game of the Spassky-Petrosian championship match (Moscow, 1966) as follows: "[Spassky] offered Petrosian to play in a backyard of the house where Petrosian grew up. " I hope that after reading this chapter you will be more familiar with labyrinth of the city named Akiba Rubinstein Gambit
S. Klimov. Hardship of calculation-2
In the second part of the article the problem in question will be difficulties in selection of candidate moves that are related to a standard chess education of almost all professional chessplayers from candidate master and above. It is clear that education and patterns that it imposes have beside many advantages (which are overwhelming), some disadvantages as well...
S. Klimov. HARDSHIP OF CALCULATION.
International master Sergey Klimov prepared the first part of his research dedicated to psychological difficulties of choosing candidate moves in various positions.
S. Ivanov. Theoretical survey of the Linares tournament
Commentators and professionals have generally agreed that this year supertournament in Spain turned out to be more vivid and interesting than previous. Anyway the unpalatable label 'drowsy Linares' wasn't applied to the last competition. ..
A.Shashin. CHESS PLAN – FICTION OR REALITY? PART 2.
By discrediting chess plan, we also discredit the theory of positional game of Vilgelm Steinitz. It`s really so, but not the other way, as a chess plan is one of the pillars of this theory.
A.Shashin. CHESS PLAN – FICTION OR REALITY?
I`m starting to attack. The target is a chess plan. The purpose is the full-scale discredit of this chess idol. Briefly and definitely speaking there is no place for chess plan in the modern theory of chess game! Plan is a phantom, illusion. It is an unnecessary link in a chain of chess player reasoning in search of the strongest move. Chess plan is the tale for a child in chess, the tale with dubious merits...
[<<] [<] Page : 1 common count : 1 [ > ] [ >> ]